Tuesday, December 20, 2005
Simple Enough for W
The surveillance or tapping of phones: illegal. You either do everything within the law or not.
But let's momentarily give him/them enough credit to call his/their bluff:
There is no need for him/them to go into details but let him/them just allude to a single incident where expediency was necessary, where the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court -- the "wiretap" court -- either didn't act favorably (well, there's no such incident) or fast enough, where the illegal surveillance achieved some good the court's "failure" prevented.
But there isn't any such incident.
W and his people just don't have any respect for the law. Like good fascists and Republican extremists, they're above it. W's oaths of office were lies -- the equivalent of perjury.
And remember, W's supporters are by and by tax cheats :)
Even more simply: the SOB broke the law for no reason.
And we won't go into his slimy slander of critics.
His actions with the surveillance -- that's impeachable.
But let's momentarily give him/them enough credit to call his/their bluff:
There is no need for him/them to go into details but let him/them just allude to a single incident where expediency was necessary, where the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court -- the "wiretap" court -- either didn't act favorably (well, there's no such incident) or fast enough, where the illegal surveillance achieved some good the court's "failure" prevented.
But there isn't any such incident.
W and his people just don't have any respect for the law. Like good fascists and Republican extremists, they're above it. W's oaths of office were lies -- the equivalent of perjury.
And remember, W's supporters are by and by tax cheats :)
Even more simply: the SOB broke the law for no reason.
And we won't go into his slimy slander of critics.
His actions with the surveillance -- that's impeachable.
Website Counters
