Sunday, July 09, 2006
Anyone Understand This?
The Times page 1 above-the-fold column 6 headline reads:
Still, too lazy to actually read the article, I check out the graphic -- 1,000 words, and so on and so forth.
And what I see is this:
Which, disappointly (for a graphic), raises questions.
First, what is the interplay of dark bars and light?
What's this first 9 months nonsense?
Most importantly, why in God's name, are the figures not adjusted for infaltion?
Well, 30 seconds of thought, give or take, leads to the obvious: Adjusted numbers would show a very modest increase in revenues compared to the last couple of years. More specifically, unlike the unadjusted numbers, adjusted would likely show a slowing in the drop in revenues, that is, the downward trend is somewhat lessening.
Which means the Times is back doing courtier duty.
Surprising Jump in Tax Revenues Is Curbing Deficit
Great news, of course, were it true. And the idea that there is an increase, maybe even a "jump", I don't doubt.Still, too lazy to actually read the article, I check out the graphic -- 1,000 words, and so on and so forth.
And what I see is this:
First, what is the interplay of dark bars and light?
What's this first 9 months nonsense?
Most importantly, why in God's name, are the figures not adjusted for infaltion?
Well, 30 seconds of thought, give or take, leads to the obvious: Adjusted numbers would show a very modest increase in revenues compared to the last couple of years. More specifically, unlike the unadjusted numbers, adjusted would likely show a slowing in the drop in revenues, that is, the downward trend is somewhat lessening.
Which means the Times is back doing courtier duty.
Website Counters
